[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re-approaching package tagging
|
From: |
zimoun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re-approaching package tagging |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:48:42 +0100 |
> Ah ha! :-) Now the question is whether this is a convenient and
> efficient way to search for packages.
As an happy user of Debian, I like the aptitude way convenient and
efficient to search packages.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s04s05.en.html
What do you think?
All the best,
simon
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, (continued)
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/12/18
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Chris Marusich, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, swedebugia, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging,
zimoun <=
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/20