[Gzz-commits] gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu irregu.tex

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    gzz
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        02/11/30 03:17:10

Modified files:
        Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu: irregu.tex 

Log message:
        obj

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex.diff?tr1=1.99&tr2=1.100&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex
diff -u gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.99 
gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.100
--- gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex:1.99        Sat Nov 30 
03:16:45 2002
+++ gzz/Documentation/Manuscripts/Irregu/irregu.tex     Sat Nov 30 03:17:09 2002
@@ -314,9 +314,14 @@
 
 % Fourier viewpoint
 
+One thing that we hope to achieve is that instead of having to perceive
+two objects, the ``hole'' of the viewport and the the canvas behind,
+the user would have to perceive only the torn piece, as in 
Fig.~\ref{figparadigm}.
+However, whether this can is achieved remains the subject of further study.
+
 Additionally, the motion of the uneven edge can be used to give the
 user a cue about the motion of the viewport, and
-the style of the ripples can give a cue about the scale of the view.
+the style and size of the ripples can give a cue about the scale of the view.
 
 
 % The important difference is that
@@ -341,7 +346,7 @@
 
 % Focus+context
 
-From a purely physical viewpoint the tearout is not really
+Now, from a purely physical viewpoint the tearout is not really
 a good metaphor\cite{kuhn91formalization}:
 a real torn piece of paper cannot change the place from where it is torn, with 
the edges rippling etc.
 However, the idea of break lines in technical drawings is well