gzz-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gzz] 25th, 26th, 27th & 28th (hh)


From: Tuomas Lukka
Subject: Re: [Gzz] 25th, 26th, 27th & 28th (hh)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:00:37 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

> 
> As I have said earlier, I don't know Gzz very well yet. That's why it's quite
> hard to answer Gzz specific questions (how Gzz *really* differ from existing 
> p2p
> systems). But I will try to respond to research questions:

Maybe it would be better first to try to answer all the ones you can and only
then really write. Because this is the major part of the thesis!

> -For research questions a, b, and c, I know what the p2p field has to offer: 
> the
> best effort is DHTs with O(log n) (with small variations).

Again: with what assumptions? Who has to be trusted? How reliably is a block
going to be found?

Does this work also with the "local store" model?

> -For e, there are some proposals, e.g. SQL-like searchs in DHTs and keyword
> searchs. However, this is quite Gzz specific, e.g. Urn-5 etc. (?)

Urn-5: think about it as a very unique keyword.

> -For f, same algoritmical limits hold true in this too. 

Which ones?

> This is also Gzz
> specific and is, at least someway, implentation issue when we have the basic
> infrastructure builded (a, b, c)

It is similar to c) but not the same.

> -For g and h, same as f (?)

Not a satisfactory answer.

> -For i, There are some clever implementations for this in Groove. But I don't
> know how it can scale in situations where there are *lot* of users. Some other
> keywords which might be relevant are SDSI and SPKI. However, I haven't put 
> much
> effort on this yet.
> 
> If I remember right, a and b was the most important questions, right ?

They all are important. Maybe you should really try to work on that chapter
first.

        Tuomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]