heartlogic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning


From: Joshua N Pritikin
Subject: [Heartlogic-dev] Re: fine tuning
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:03:42 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:17:04AM -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> A quick random thought...Hrm, I intuitively think 8 clicks might
> be too many.
> 
> One thing I think we should get rid of for the initial stages is asking
> them for diagnosis.  1) it might scare people 2) it wasn't part of the
> original dissertation study so, why should it be now?...But, yes, longer
> term we will definitely want this info, or info like it....E.g. we might
> want their scale on the Gilliam Autism Scale, but this is an issue for
> much later.  But my suspicion is that we will have a devil of a time
> getting the, shoot, I think it is 90 subjects minimum we need. (10 per
> group, 9 groups, i think).

I am quick to agree.

Fixed.

New experts are no longer presented with the diagnostic page.

-- 
A new cognitive theory of emotion, http://openheartlogic.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]