[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union
From: |
Richard B. Kreckel |
Subject: |
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:14:15 +0100 (CET) |
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Hans Aberg wrote:
[...]
> > Use CVS.
>
> I think I will wait until it is sufficiently stable for putting in the
> distribution. -- I think this is what others will do, so before that
> happens, you will not get proper feedback.
Sorry for interrupting your little private dispute, but I think you are a
little bit too pessimistic. Using CVS there won't be proper feedback
because nobody notices deep changes. But you can still make prereleases,
announce them and mark them clearly as "not-yet-for-distros". As it
happens, ftp://alpha.gnu.org/ exists for exactly this purpose. :-)
Cheers
-richy.
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<address@hidden>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, (continued)
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Christian Bauer, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union,
Richard B. Kreckel <=
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20