[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 21:59:33 +0100 |
At 19:30 +0100 2002/03/18, Akim Demaille wrote:
>Richard> ... Using CVS there
>Richard> won't be proper feedback because nobody notices deep changes.
>Richard> But you can still make prereleases, announce them and mark
>Richard> them clearly as "not-yet-for-distros". As it happens,
>Richard> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/ exists for exactly this purpose. :-)
>
>That's the plan, indeed. When we are ready.
I think that if Akim has something that he can compile his C++ projects
with and suggests others to try from the CVS, one should be able to put
into the regular distribution as an undocumented feature. :-)
-- After all, other Bison features have come and gone (and the compile C as
C++ feature is undocumented as well), and this way, it gives those that
really needs C++ to try it out. The C++ feedback can then come in order to
prevent some nasty surprises when it becomes a documented feature.
Hans Aberg
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, (continued)
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Christian Bauer, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/18