Re: member with constructor not allowed in union

[Anthony DeRobertis]

On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:

> First,
> somebody implemented a dynamic C stack, which was probably OK 
> on early C++
> compilers that did not detect the C++ union-non-trivial constructor
> prohibition. And then when people upgrade their C++ compilers,

No, the implementation of the dynamic C stack changed. Earlier 
versions of bison compile fine with, e.g., gcc 3. Newer versions 
don't. http://bugs.debian.org/130914 contains all the details.