[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison 1.34a is released (Was: member with constructor not allowed in
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Bison 1.34a is released (Was: member with constructor not allowed in union) |
Date: |
20 Mar 2002 20:16:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard B Kreckel <address@hidden> writes:
Richard> On 20 Mar 2002, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> Thanks for having addressed this issue. We now have a prototype of
>> 1.35. I'm basically making this beta so that people can check
>> their issues are solved indeed, for translators to have a last shot
>> before the release, and for someone to adjust my NEWS which is
>> certainly not proper English.
Richard> Thanks, looks good.
Richard> Vincent, do you think you could package 1.34a for Debian,
Richard> mark urgency as high and close the showstopping bug #130914?
Please, don't. I plan to release 1.35 this week or next Monday, there
is no need for 1.34a.
Richard> Also, as a nitpicking remark, I noticed a couple of minor
Richard> typo fixes and redundant patches in Debian's
Richard> bison_1.34-1.diff.gz. It would be nice if this could
Richard> eventually be boiled down to a minimum.
If there remains generic patches, please, send them to address@hidden
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, (continued)
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/19
- Bison 1.34a is released (Was: member with constructor not allowed in union), Akim Demaille, 2002/03/20
- Re: Bison 1.34a is released (Was: member with constructor not allowed in union), Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/20
- Re: Bison 1.34a is released (Was: member with constructor not allowed in union),
Akim Demaille <=
- Debian changes for Bison, Paul Eggert, 2002/03/20
- Re: Debian changes for Bison, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/21
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/20
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/14