[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence
|
From: |
John W. Millaway |
|
Subject: |
Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT) |
> The fix to parse.y to follow this precedence is trivial and I've already
> done that and tested the result.
This is not "trivial" -- it will break many existing flex scanners.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, (continued)
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, John W. Millaway, 2002/04/27
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/28
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, W. L. Estes, 2002/04/28
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/29
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/04/29
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Hans Aberg, 2002/04/29
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 2002/04/29
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, W. L. Estes, 2002/04/29
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, W. L. Estes, 2002/04/29
Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Casey Leedom, 2002/04/26
- Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence,
John W. Millaway <=
Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence, Casey Leedom, 2002/04/30