Re: Flex vs. POSIX 1003.2-1992 repeat operator {} precedence

[W. L. Estes]

On Monday, 29 April 2002,10:35 +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:

> Then there should perhaps be two options, one for POSIX lex and one for
> AT&T lex. If one breaks down the differences into atoms, selectable by
> options, it should not be so difficult to implement.

This was what I ended up telling the SGI folks that I'd like. They
said they were working on it.

-- 
Will Estes
Unix Systems Programmer
UNCG MIS, Systems Group