[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status
From: |
Jamison Hope |
Subject: |
Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:37:37 -0400 |
Hi, Charlie,
On Aug 9, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Charles Turner wrote:
I've cleaned up the repository, it should build without any problems
now. I've tried to reduce the problem by commenting out most of the
new def*Fld's in CommonLisp, this is what I've noticed:
* With all the def*Fld's commented out, I would get warnings when
compiling the primitives.lisp files about LENGTH, GENSYM and SYMBOL-
NAME being unbound, this made sense because their call sites were
before their definitions (and hence the warnings would disappear
compiling again, if loadClass(primitives) is not commented out).
Adding def*Fld's for these three functions caused an error rather
than a warning when building the primitives from scratch:
primitives.lisp:152:23: exception loading 'COMMON-LISP:SYMBOL-NAME'
- no such class: gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives
[ and similar messages for the other two examples ]
* Once the primitives file is compiled and I use loadClass on it,
everything appears to work fine, the names are bound from the REPL,
etc.
* If you remove the loadClass("gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives") line
after the primitives file has been compiled, no names appear to be
bound from the REPL, for example, assuming this is uncommented in
CommonLisp:
defProcStFld("gensym", "gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives");
Then from the REPL I see:
#|kawa:1|# #'gensym
/dev/stdin:1:3: warning - no declaration seen for COMMON-LISP:GENSYM
/dev/stdin:1:3: unbound location
at gnu.kawa.reflect.FieldLocation.get(FieldLocation.java:200)
at gnu.kawa.reflect.FieldLocation.get(FieldLocation.java:188)
at gnu.mapping.PlainLocation.get(PlainLocation.java:21)
at gnu.mapping.SharedLocation.get(SharedLocation.java:21)
[ snipped ... ]
which is the same output as when the above defProcStFld(gensym..) is
commented out, so it appears to do nothing at the moment.
I'm seeing that as well. I moved LENGTH, GENSYM, and SYMBOL-NAME up in
the file a bit so that their definitions come before their first calls
and that got rid of the "exception loading 'COMMON-LISP:LENGTH' - no
such class: gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives" and "exception loading
'COMMON-LISP:LENGTH' - null" errors.
With the loadClass() call in CommonLisp commented out, the functions
remain
unbound until gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives is explicitly loaded:
$ kawa --lisp
#|kawa:1|# #'gensym
/dev/stdin:1:3: warning - no declaration seen for COMMON-LISP:GENSYM
/dev/stdin:1:3: unbound location
at gnu.kawa.reflect.FieldLocation.get(FieldLocation.java:200)
at gnu.kawa.reflect.FieldLocation.get(FieldLocation.java:188)
at gnu.mapping.PlainLocation.get(PlainLocation.java:21)
at gnu.mapping.SharedLocation.get(SharedLocation.java:21)
at gnu.mapping.ThreadLocation.get(ThreadLocation.java:105)
at atInteractiveLevel$1.run(stdin:1)
at gnu.expr.ModuleExp.evalModule2(ModuleExp.java:309)
at gnu.expr.ModuleExp.evalModule(ModuleExp.java:210)
at kawa.Shell.run(Shell.java:279)
at kawa.Shell.run(Shell.java:194)
at kawa.Shell.run(Shell.java:175)
at kawa.repl.main(repl.java:891)
#|kawa:2|# (require class::|gnu.commonlisp.lisp.primitives|)
#|kawa:3|# #'gensym
#<procedure GENSYM>
So for now I guess leave it in there. Not sure why it works for Scheme
but not for Lisp. There's clearly some piece of the magic that we're
missing.
Jamie
--
Jamison Hope
The PTR Group
www.theptrgroup.com
- [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/06
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/06
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/06
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/08
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status,
Jamison Hope <=
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/10
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/10
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/10
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Jamison Hope, 2012/08/10
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Helmut Eller, 2012/08/11
- Re: [Kawa-commonlisp-dev] [GSoC] Status, Charles Turner, 2012/08/11