|
From: | Robert Martinez |
Subject: | Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Label Campaign |
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 10:08:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 23/05/12 23:12, John Sullivan wrote:
There seems to be much disagreement about the effectiveness of the "human readable deed" approach. I would suggest for the first iteration of this, use the existing Free Software Definition page (possibly after making a few improvements to the introduction). This is analogous to other labeling programs to me. Labeling criteria are often very specific and detailed; I think ours would actually be quite simple compared to many that are out there (for animal testing, eco-friendly, and so on).
I wouldn't suggest to omit the info.I'd rather put the walls of text on a prominent link called "FULL DEFINITION" or something else. The focus should be on making the key values easily visible, such as only mentioning the four freedoms (maybe with examples) and a list of the most common licenses that are regarded free software.
Do you think we would loose something that way?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |