libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Amusing Free Software Story


From: Aaron Wolf
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Amusing Free Software Story
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:50:21 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I'm sorry, but it's ok to take a stand for "free software" only in the
context that you want to go about explaining it — which we *should*
want to do, but can't always be done.

"Open" has always been an inadequate term from the beginning. It
didn't start fine and then get messed up. So, there's no analog to the
idea that "libre" starts fine and then will get corrupted.

"Libre" is a fine term overall, and the idea that it's going to end up
with "libre-washing" is really just paranoid speculation. There's no
reason to think it's susceptible to the same issues, given that Open
was mediocre term to start with.

"Software freedom" is a perfectly fine term, and if we want to stand
our ground, that's the term we should stand on.

On 03/17/2015 08:26 PM, rysiek wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 17 marca 2015 13:22:55 Aaron Wolf pisze:
>> "Freedom software" is acceptable enough… indeed "free software"
>> is broken in that you can't even search for it reliably because
>> of the confusion over the term.
> 
> I have a different take on this: we either stand our ground and
> fight for our language, or we *will* get pushed off of the next
> term, and the next, and the next.
> 
> Look what's happening with "open". Openwashing is a huge problem.
> We can move to "libre", but sooner or later the very same dynamic
> will take over. At some point we *will* have to make a stand.
> 
> So we might as well make a stand here, with "free software".
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=54Qz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]