[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: penalty -> permission patch
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: penalty -> permission patch |
Date: |
Sat, 6 May 2006 15:08:38 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Fri, 5 May 2006 18:43, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Joe Neeman wrote:
> > First of all, instead of penalty, breakable and page-penalty, we now
> > have: break-penalty, break-permission
> > page-break-penalty, page-break-permission
> > page-turn-penalty, page-turn-permission
>
> sounds good.
>
> > where XXX-permission can be 'allow, 'force or 'forbid.
>
> can you drop the 'allow ? I think it's the proper default, so undefined
> ( SCM_EOL or rather, !scm_is_symbol() ) just means allow.
Actually now that I come to implement this, there is a problem. I can't see
how to implement \break using only 2 symbols (and '()) because \break needs
to avoid modifying page-break-permission and page-turn-permission. So I need
a total of 4 symbols, at least in the BreakEvent: 'forbid, 'allow, 'force and
'() where '() doesn't change the setting.
I don't think I've explained it very well, but suppose you want to do \break
\noPageBreak. Then \noPageBreak needs to respect the changes made by \break
so there must be a symbol that means "don't change anything" to the
paper-column-engraver.
- penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/05
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/05
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/05
- Re: penalty -> permission patch,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/06
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/06
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/06
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/07
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/07
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Joe Neeman, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/08
- Re: penalty -> permission patch, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/05/09