[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \times -> \tuplet
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: \times -> \tuplet |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 22:58:21 +0100 (CET) |
> > There has already been a *huge* thread on the -user list about
> > this, and the conclusion was that the only realistic change we
> > could do was renaming \times to \tuplet, and nothing else;
Yes; even if it's mathematical nonsense, the nominator/denominator
order shouldn't change.
> I am still very much opposed to this as a mandatory change. Aliasing
> times to tuplet would be great.
Yes.
> \times syntax and have never had any problem confusing it with
> \time. \tuplet is longer to type and falls much more strangely on
> the keyboard than does \times.
Only a native English speaker can say that \time is difficult to mix
up with \times. I think that my English is not very bad, and I still
sometimes mix them up.
Werner
- \times -> \tuplet (was Re: Issue 566 in lilypond: showStaffSwitch -> \staffSwitchOn), John Mandereau, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet (was Re: Issue 566 in lilypond: showStaffSwitch -> \staffSwitchOn), Bryan Stanbridge, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Rune Zedeler, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/28
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Graham Percival, 2008/01/28
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/27
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/01/29
- Re: \times -> \tuplet, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/01/27