[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:59:05 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Johannes Schindelin <
> address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So it doesn't give an error, just a warning. But AFAIR I have seen
> > > this warning on my non-GUI-based checkouts, too, even though
> > > everything worked fine. BTW, my git version is 1.6.0.4 (the latest
> > > one that Ubuntu 9.04 has to offer).
> >
> > Ouch, I think I know what happened. Git used your _current_ working
> > directory as work tree. So you have some stray LilyPond files lying
> > around somewhere.
> >
> >
> Aha! That's why I found a bunch of lily files in my $HOME/bin/
> directory! I found a lily/ directory inadvertently last night, and now
> that I look, there's the Documentation, ly, make, stepmake, etc. So the
> files did get downloaded, just not where expected. Easily fixed...
Well, not as easily as I thought: git pull does not like the "work-tree"
option. But it is fixed in the current lilycontrib script.
Ciao,
Dscho
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Francisco Vila, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", John Mandereau, 2009/08/10