[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r"
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r" |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:06:18 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> > I pushed a new version to git://repo.or.cz/lilypond/dscho.git. You
> > can download it directly here:
> >
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/lilypond/dscho.git?a=blob_plain;f=lilycontrib.tcl;hb=lilycontrib
>
> Cool, works like a charm now. Thanks a lot!
I actually had to change the --work-tree things, since it is utter
garbage. I _know_ why I was opposed to its inclusion.
> One minor comment: For new contributors with no experience in git (or
> version control in general) it may seem as though nothing happens after
> pressing the button. Thus I'd suggest to add two messages to indicate
> that the process was started, along the lines of:
>
> ==>
> proc update_lilypond {} {
> global lily_dir
> if {![file exists $lily_dir]} {
> write_to_output "Starting to clone LilyPond repository (this
> can take some time) ...\n"
> file mkdir $lily_dir
> git init
> git config core.bare false
> git remote add -t master \
> origin git://repo.or.cz/lilypond.git
> git fetch --depth 1
> git reset --hard origin/master
> git config branch.master.remote origin
> git config branch.master.merge refs/heads/master
> .update configure -text "Update LilyPond"
> } else {
> write_to_output "Starting to update LilyPond repository ...\n"
> git fetch origin
> git merge origin/master
> }
> write_to_output "Done.\n"
> }
> <==
I added two shorter notices, and I also set the busy cursor now.
Ciao,
Dscho
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", (continued)
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Graham Percival, 2009/08/10
- Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/10
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r",
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Maximilian Albert, 2009/08/12
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Jonathan Kulp, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11
- Re: lilycontrib.tcl, was Re: the "r" in "git pull -r", Johannes Schindelin, 2009/08/11