[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened? |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:18:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Thanks for the in depth and very useful response -- sounds
> like Lilypond is currently doing essentially the right
> thing.
Actually, I don't think it is. As Carl certainly
demonstrated, the situation is complicated. Ted Ross is by
far the most detailed and specific, but he occasionally
presents things in a confusing order. I've attached a file
in an attempt to clarify the issue.
Is anyone in favor of making the changes I've indicated on
the "suggested compromise" staff?
- Mark
stem_lengths.ly
Description: Binary data
- midstaff line = stem shortened?, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/07
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/11
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/12