[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:06:10 -0700 (PDT) |
For what it's worth, I figured out an algorithm for
improving the stem lengths, to accommodate making
adjustments dynamically, according to the guidelines set
forth by Ted Ross. I don't know if anyone cares to do this
right now, but I might as well post it in case someone
eventually wants to.
This assumes that the default Stem #'length for
\clef treble \stemUp c''
will be corrected from #6 to #5, and that the default Stem
#'length for
\clef treble \stemDown b'
will be corrected from #6 to #7.
See the attachment.
- Mark
stem_length_algorithm.txt
Description: Text document
- midstaff line = stem shortened?, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/07
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/11
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/12