[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: midstaff line = stem shortened? |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:51:26 -0700 (PDT) |
Oops. Too slight errors in the previous post's attachment:
61c61
< c) is downstem
---
> c) is upstem
76,77c76,78
< run is a second, and neither note is on the middle line, then
< move on (no adjustment is needed in this case).
---
> run is a second, and neither note is in the space below the
> middle line, then move on (no adjustment is needed in this
> case).
I've attached a revised version here.
- Mark
stem_length_algorithm.txt
Description: Text document
- midstaff line = stem shortened?, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/04/07
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/10
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/11
- Re: midstaff line = stem shortened?, Mark Polesky, 2010/04/12