[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:08:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
> > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
> > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>
> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
> in lilypond/translation.
I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history? I
mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
multiple different versions of the repository; would something
like that be required in the future?
Or does it only affect lilypond/translation, which we don't look
at the stats for?
Cheers,
- Graham
- 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Graham Percival, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/16
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Graham Percival, 2010/04/17
- Re: duplicate commits in git (was: 2.13.18 might not contain everything), Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/17
- Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/17
Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything, Francisco Vila, 2010/04/18