Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

[Francisco Vila]

2010/4/17 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>> > My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
>> > right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
>> > fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>>
>> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
>> in lilypond/translation.
>
> I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
> in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history?

Not too much. Just a bit of noise. You know, there is not a big
flashing caption telling you what branch are you in, but there are
tools that help on keeping oriented.

>  I
> mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
> multiple different versions of the repository; would something
> like that be required in the future?

Something like what exactly? Our latest repo works fine for me and my
habits have not changed.

> Or does it only affect lilypond/translation, which we don't look
> at the stats for?

In the long term, stats for all branches are identical as long as they
got merged periodically.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com