[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: order of engravers
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: order of engravers |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:26:21 -0400 |
Hi Graham,
> And have you decided whether this should just go in the
> @knownissues on that page, or should it be a separate section?
I think it should be in the @knownissues.
> That's just it -- there isn't anybody to guide you gently into
> that good night. The only clue I know about the IR is that it's
> partly generated by scheme functions in scm/documentation*.
>
> Mark knows more, and various people like Neil, Patrick, and Carl
> seem to know everything about all parts of lilypond, so maybe they
> could help... but AFAIK nobody has a good grasp of the whole
> system.
I'll see what I can do.
To be honest, I'd really like to tackle a few other issues which are far more
pressing (in my scores).
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: order of engravers, (continued)
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Neil Puttock, 2010/04/28
Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28