[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: order of engravers
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: order of engravers |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:10:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:26:21PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> > That's just it -- there isn't anybody to guide you gently into
> > that good night. The only clue I know about the IR is that it's
> > partly generated by scheme functions in scm/documentation*.
>
> I'll see what I can do.
> To be honest, I'd really like to tackle a few other issues which
> are far more pressing (in my scores).
I'd also like you to tackle a few other issues which are far more
pressing. In fact, at the moment I can't think of any issue which
is *less* pressing than the IR order of engravers issue. By all
means, prioritize your time.
James: I still want the NR updated with the manual list; *that*
issue is not non-pressing.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: order of engravers, (continued)
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, David Kastrup, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28
- Re: order of engravers, Neil Puttock, 2010/04/28
Re: order of engravers, Graham Percival, 2010/04/28