[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
issue classification: priority guidelines
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
issue classification: priority guidelines |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:53:02 +0100 |
Hi,
I've read Issue classification and i think it would be good to add one
more guideline concerning priority: i believe that the priority should
depend on how widespread the issue is. Even minor problems concernning
some basic elements (that will probably happen many times in even a
single score) should be more important than an ugly collision that
came from a contrived example and is not likely to happen more often
than once or twice in hundred scores, or is related to very specific
and complex engraving situations.
Do you agree?
cheers,
Janek
- issue classification: priority guidelines,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/12/15
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/15
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Graham Percival, 2010/12/15
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Janek Warchoł, 2010/12/15
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Phil Holmes, 2010/12/15
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Janek Warchoł, 2010/12/16
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/16
- Re: issue classification: priority guidelines, Graham Percival, 2010/12/15