Re: Doc: NR cross-staff (issue3782042)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 12/24/10 9:37 PM, "Keith OHara" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:54:38 -0800, <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...]I would prefer to see the original example retained to show in the
>> starkest
>> fashion how staves should be changed manually, with this one added later
>> to show the possibility of collisions.
> 
> That's a better way to do it.  The attached patch reverts the original
> example, and is a simple addition of one @lilypond and one paragraph.
> 
> Carl started this issue for me, and I think it best to stay on his issue
> number for continuity. Carl will probably upload the patch to his issue for
> me, but we can't expect that to happen too soon.

Oh -- I misunderstood.  I'll go ahead and post on Reitveld.

Carl