[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: \hideNote
From: |
Adam Spiers |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: \hideNote |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:29:51 +0000 |
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
>> two 'similar' functions
>>
>> \hideNote
>> \hideNotes
>>
>> Is a good idea.
>
> I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn
> and \sustainOff).
> So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then \hideNote could
> stand for "\once \hideNotesOn".
> That seems clear to me.
Ah, that makes sense. I could do the rename, but is there some process
for handling non-backwards-compatible changes in syntax?
- RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Graham Percival, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/11/02