[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053)
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053) |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:37:12 +0000 |
Oh, by the way, I suggest that you wait for Issue 2003 to go through
before investing too much effort in documenting your interfaces. Then
you don't need a separate interface for "manual" and "automatic"
footnotes, but can just use something like \footnote\default for
autogeneration of footnote marks, in strict analogy to \mark (which is
changed to be a music function in Issue 2003).
I think that would be quite more natural for the user.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5315053/
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), pkx166h, 2011/11/02
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), graham, 2011/11/02
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053),
dak <=
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), mtsolo, 2011/11/02
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), mtsolo, 2011/11/02
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), dak, 2011/11/02
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), pkx166h, 2011/11/04
- Re: Doc: NR Added new node for Custom Footnotes (issue 5315053), pkx166h, 2011/11/19