[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:58:38 +0200 |
On 4 Jul 2012, at 09:35, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Alternatively, I have a scheme function returning a boolean. This function has
> to be called from inside some c++-routines, but this doesn't work yet (see
> below).
...
> I'll have a look in the train today and write you a more detailed response.
> In the meantime, ask the devel list if the gcc compiler can handle the types
> of anonymous functions specified here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_function#C.2B.2B
GCC 4.5 and later, see "lambda" here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
But it will take some time before all compilers can handle this. For example,
those that are provided by Xcode on Mac OS X do not, except for the latest
preview, which only works on 10.7 and later.
Hans
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, (continued)
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Joe Neeman, 2012/07/05
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/05
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, address@hidden, 2012/07/05
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Joe Neeman, 2012/07/05
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/06
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, David Kastrup, 2012/07/06
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/06
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Joe Neeman, 2012/07/06
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Marc Hohl, 2012/07/06
- Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?, Joe Neeman, 2012/07/06
Re: Is gcc able to handle anonymous functions?,
Hans Aberg <=