[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052) |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jul 2012 20:58:08 +0200 |
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:36 PM, address@hidden
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> No idea when i'll have time to finish Tie Report, but as tie shapes
>> are screwed in general, i wouldn't care much about this change. New
>> shape isn't worse than previous one, i'd say.
>
> I think that there's supposed to be a bit of space in there, no? What does
> Gould say?
Definitely, current output is wrong. But as i said, i'm not sure if
it's worth bothering as ties are screwed in general.
> What's important is to figure out why this change is happening. As ties only
> ever use Skylines made from boxes (and not from stencil integrals), there
> must be some weird subtlety about spacing somewhere (or perhaps the new
> Skyline code) that is causing this.
Indeed, whatever the output is it shouldn't change because of new skylines.
>> Hmm. I have another idea, which would be more difficult but also
>> extremely awesome, and it would be very handy for area spacing (see
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-03/msg00507.html):
>> make the skyline shape "magnetic". See illustration here:
>> http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/file/n5705595/magnetic_skylines_demo.pdf
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> It wouldn't be too bad from a coding perspective. The function deholify
> already does this for single skylines: try the skyline of a large font-size
> string "f _ f" or something like that and the holes should be plugged
> with a sloped building.
>
> When there are multiple grobs involved, what becomes tricky is knowing which
> ones should allow for snug-fitting and which ones not. I think that, as time
> goes on, we'll realize where the snug spacing is too close and will modify it
> w/ padding values.
Do you mean that padding should influence skylines' "magnetism"?
Something like this:
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/file/n5705597/magnetic_skylines_-_padding.pdf
(i.e. there would be only one setting, which would affect both the
padding and magnetism of the skylines)?
I think it might be a good idea.
cheers,
Janek
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), (continued)
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/07/01
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/07/01
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), mtsolo, 2012/07/02
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), Janek Warchoł, 2012/07/03
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), address@hidden, 2012/07/04
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), Janek Warchoł, 2012/07/04
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), address@hidden, 2012/07/04
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052),
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), address@hidden, 2012/07/05
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), Janek Warchoł, 2012/07/05
- Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), Phil Holmes, 2012/07/04
Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), dak, 2012/07/09
Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), joeneeman, 2012/07/14
Re: Gets vertical skylines from grob stencils (issue 5626052), mtsolo, 2012/07/14