[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:01:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:39:18AM +0100, @tiredpixel wrote:
> >http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/References.html
>
> Do you happen to know the GNU stance on 'recommending' software
> licensed under a 'free' license (as defined by
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html), but not GNU? For instance,
> would LilyPond be able to embrace software licensed under MIT?
Yes, that's discussed in the second paragraph, and it's ok. The
important from their perspective is promoting Free software /
discouraging non-Free software, not being a member of the GNU
project.
- Graham
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Graham Percival, 2012/07/04
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Graham Percival, 2012/07/04
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Graham Percival, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Mark Knoop, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Mark Knoop, 2012/07/16