[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:38:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:06:47PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> ------------------------------required
>
> 6.3 - list authors
> check (git does this)
but not in source tarballs.
> 6.5 - copyright notice
> um, we're not doing it yet, are we? So, a bug report?
I suppose there's no harm in filing a bug report for this.
> 13&8 - don't recommend non-free programs
> i don't see changes on the website - have we decided that we delete
> them, or just "mention they exist"?
I'm still checking for "web services". Otherwise, we delete them
(or at least comment them out). My patch got buried in a branch
that I forgot about, but I'll upload it to git-cl soon.
> 14.1 - don't say "open source"
> problem with German translation. Who is its maintainer (didn't found
> in CG) - Till Paala? I don't see his address in my address book.
> Reinhold, could you do this maybe (i see you did some translations)?
> If nobody does this, i'll use Google Translate and my vestigial German
> skillz to fix it mysself.
That's the problem of the translation meister -- either to send
the problem to the appropriate person, fix it himself, or to
disable the translation if there's no easy way to fix it.
I've heard from a senior gnu person that this doesn't need to hold
back the stable/2.16 release as long as we're actively trying to
fix it.
> 14.2 - don't say "Linux" (since it's a curse word, as everyone knows ;P)
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6374060 (not very impressive, sorry)
You don't need to run "make doc" yourself, but I noted a problem
in the review comments.
> 12.3 - manual formats
> WTF plain ASCII for music program manual? Like what, ASCII-art for
> every snippet? As for ps and dvi, they can go to hell since everyone
> can use pdf. We're doing good enough.
I imagine that the ASCII version would just say
[image of music]
Not very exciting, but I suppose that it would be just as
informative as the full docs to a blind reader ?
We fulfill the spirit of that policy (with info), and it's only a
"recommended", not a "required".
> 12.3 - old link to our docs at gnu.org/manual
> i've sent an email to GNU about this.
thanks.
- Graham
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Graham Percival, 2012/07/04
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Graham Percival, 2012/07/04
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/07/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Mark Knoop, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Mark Knoop, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Federico Bruni, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Federico Bruni, 2012/07/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, John Mandereau, 2012/07/24
- Re: GOP-PROP 2-1: LilyPond is part of GNU, Mark Knoop, 2012/07/16