[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092)
From: |
graham |
Subject: |
Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 01:39:02 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/6344092/diff/7001/input/regression/cross-staff-stems.ly
File input/regression/cross-staff-stems.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6344092/diff/7001/input/regression/cross-staff-stems.ly#newcode2
input/regression/cross-staff-stems.ly:2:
Sorry, I was unclear. I meant to ask for your new snippet to be a
regtest in *addition* to a snippet, not as a replacement. We do not
expect users to look at regtests, so it's important to discuss this
functionality in a snippet or the docs.
In addition, the regtest should still have a texidoc header (like other
regtests) -- I meant to only ask you to remove the lsrtags and doctitle
from the regtest version of the snippet.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6344092/
- Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), PhilEHolmes, 2012/07/09
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), tdanielsmusic, 2012/07/09
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), graham, 2012/07/13
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), PhilEHolmes, 2012/07/13
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092),
graham <=
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), PhilEHolmes, 2012/07/14
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/07/14
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), graham, 2012/07/14
- Re: Adds support for cross-staff-stems (issue 6344092), tdanielsmusic, 2012/07/19