[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 1320: Scheme bar line interface (issue 6305115)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 1320: Scheme bar line interface (issue 6305115) |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:28:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Marc Hohl <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 20.07.2012 12:24, schrieb address@hidden:
>> On 2012/07/20 10:15:41, marc wrote:
>>
>>> I think the differences concerning MIDI output can safely be
>>> ignored,
>>
>> What makes it safe to ignore them?
> Well, I don't know.
>
> But diffs like
>
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> Parsing...
> +Renaming input to: `out-test/voice-5-midi.ly'
> Renaming input to: `out-test/voice-5-midi.ly'
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> @@ -14,3 +15,5 @@
> Writing ./b7/lily-6a4f9eea-systems.tex...
> Writing ./b7/lily-6a4f9eea-systems.count...
> Writing timing to b7/lily-6a4f9eea.profile...
> +Writing timing to ./lily-run-total.profile...
> +Success: compilation successfully completed
>
> look like internal changes during the compilation to me.
Sure.
> I cannot imagine how a scheme-created stencil would influence the
> MIDI output in any way.
Well, _here_ you use "MIDI output" meaning the output in MIDI format,
not console messages during MIDI-related regtests. But when you stated
"I think the differences concerning MIDI output can safely be ignored,"
you used it in an unusual meaning.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Issue 1320: Scheme bar line interface (issue 6305115), dak, 2012/07/20
Re: Issue 1320: Scheme bar line interface (issue 6305115), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/07/20
Re: Issue 1320: Scheme bar line interface (issue 6305115), k-ohara5a5a, 2012/07/23