[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:48:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Mandereau <address@hidden> writes:
> 2012/7/30 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>> I'm not convinced that this is an advantage. I'd rather have one
>> central place to look for patches and their status (currently
>> google code, filtered by "has:Patch" and sorted based on patch
>> status[1]). If "not bug fixes" patches aren't listed in the same
>> place as "bug fix" patches, then we'll have two websites to check
>> and keep up-to-date.
>
> I have never meant this. I meant that if we decide to adopt Gerrit,
> then *all* pending patches will be on Gerrit, but patches that don't
> come from bug reports on Google Code tracker needn't be added there.
>
>
>> In short: we already have a global eye on submitted patches,
>> provided that people use git-cl.
>
> Gerrit can provide this as well, and might offer a better global eye
> than a generic issue tracker, be it an excellent one like Google Code.
There is no point arguing this. We can't do a reasonable side-by-side
comparison and/or transition if we don't work with the same frontend.
The decision to change the frontend would be a rather invasive one, and
one can't use more than one frontend in parallel since the point of the
frontend is to provide a _complete_ overview over existing issues.
> We certainly agree on this as long as we use Rietveld for patches
> review, but if we find a better tool that provides a good frontend for
> patches review that can also integrate with Google code, then there's
> no reason to keep Google code as the frontend.
Again: wrong time to argue this. One thing after the other.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, (continued)
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, David Kastrup, 2012/07/23
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/23
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, Graham Percival, 2012/07/23
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/30
- Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, David Kastrup, 2012/07/30
- Message not available
- Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/30
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, Graham Percival, 2012/07/30
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/07/30
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, David Kastrup, 2012/07/30
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/30
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/31
- Re: Fwd: Using MSH Paris Nord server, John Mandereau, 2012/07/31
Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, Graham Percival, 2012/07/23
Re: Using MSH Paris Nord server, Lilyfan, 2012/07/25