[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 20:40:00 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this an argument for delimiting the argument list?
>
> It is. The disadvantage is that it breaks all existing files.
I think i remember one of the developers saying "we should also care
for future users, and that's [hopefully] a bigger group than current
users".
I don't mean that we should screw our current users - i mean that we
shouldn't get around design flaws that we'll be still cursing in 20
years from now :)
Janek
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Joe Neeman, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Joe Neeman, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/05
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/05
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/02