Re: Did VerticalAxisGroup default-staff-staff-spacing stop respecting padding in 2.17.10?

[David Kastrup]

Trevor Bača <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Did VerticalAxisGroup's default-staff-staff-spacing property stop
> respecting the 'padding' attribute between 2.17.9 and 2.17.10?
>
> I ask because I use a custom time signature context in my scores.
>
> Short examples using the custom time signature context under 2.17.9
> and 2.17.10 are attached. You can see that the time signatures in the
> 2.17.9 example float in their own context positioned happily above the
> notes. But the time signatures in the 2.17.10 example have fallen and
> intermingle with the notes.

Most likely candidate

commit 7d3d28de0ce6e2f018aff599cecd944d1754fe3c
Author: Mike Solomon <address@hidden>
Date:   Thu Jan 10 08:54:12 2013 +0100

    Makes all side-positioning based on skylines instead of boxes.
    
    The major work is in side-position-interface.cc, with minor
    modifications at several places in the code-base to adapt to this.
    
    This allows for snugger positioning of horizontally-oriented
    fingerings.
    
    A side-effect of this patch is that side-positioning of all
    cross-staff grobs delves into the element list of axis-groups
    in order to better guess position, which results in less
    collisions (for example, dynamics are less likely to collide
    with cross-staff beams).

though there are some others as well.

-- 
David Kastrup