Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2013/9/22 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> > IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist.  Using LilyDev (possibly
> > in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl.
> >
> > How hard is that?
> 
> Hard.

Good.
(aside: note that my email about gerritt was aimed at moving
lilypond development back to savannah, rather than spread across
3-4 companies/platforms)

The experience from the Grand Documentation Project is that only
25% of new doc contributors ended up being a net benefit.  Having
an up-front hurdle, provided that it's well-explained, is a useful
way to weed out people who are likely to fall into the remaining
75%.  Granted, some of the 25% might also be turned away.  So it's
a question of the
  sum of values from all E(contributor | uses git-cl)
    % noting that the value from a contributor can be positive
    % or negative
vs. 
  sum of values from all E(contributor)

I'm confident that the sum of the first is greater than the
second.

- Graham