[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unverified issues?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Unverified issues? |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 16:20:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 1:15 PM
> Subject: Unverified issues?
>
>
>>
>> The issue tracker shows for
>> <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=1&q=status%3Afixed>
>> 48 unverified issues. Most of them can be verified since 2.17.27 has
>> been released. Some have Fixed_2_17_28 in spite of already being in
>> 2.17.27.
>>
>> I'd like a better record before branching the stable release branch.
>
> Traditionally Eluze works through these on a Monday. Let's check the
> situation on Tuesday.
Ah, ok.
--
David Kastrup
- Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Unverified issues?, Eluze, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Eluze, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Graham Percival, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/30
- Re: Unverified issues?, Eluze, 2013/09/30
- Re: Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/30