Re: Unverified issues?

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eluze" <address@hidden>
To: "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden>
Cc: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; 
"LilyPond Development Team" <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: Unverified issues?


> Am 29.09.2013 23:45, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> > 2013/9/29 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> > > "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > From: "Eluze" <address@hidden>
> > > > > I will treat what's left tomorrow (I'm not the only bug squad member
> > > > > allowed to do it!)
> > > > But you seem the most efficient at this :-)
> > > So what?  If you find that some worker in a factory line is more
> > > efficient as the next best worker, do you think good management would be
> > > to fire all the rest?  Will that get more work done or less?
> > I think Phil's message was meant just as a compliment...
> so I understood it - thanks ;-)
>
> but weeks ago I already told how unfair this system is: Phil's releases 
> happen on week-ends usually and then it's my turn - the others rarely get 
> the opportunity to get accustomed to verifying.


As Graham said, if you want to limit the time you spend, and spend it on 
other bug squad duties, fine - leave loads unverified.  If you've still got 
them next week, complain!

--
Phil Holmes