[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unverified issues?
From: |
Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: Unverified issues? |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:22:18 -0700 (PDT) |
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> As Graham said, if you want to limit the time you spend, and spend it on
> other bug squad duties, fine - leave loads unverified. If you've still
> got
> them next week, complain!
I'm not complaining, rather I'm pitying those who miss the chance to verify.
if one day we change the duty days there will automatically be a shift to
the member being on duty after the upgrade.
but it's good to know I can stop after my X minutes and the work will still
be done.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Unverified-issues-tp151572p151654.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Eluze, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Eluze, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Graham Percival, 2013/09/29
- Re: Unverified issues?, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/30
- Re: Unverified issues?,
Eluze <=
- Re: Unverified issues?, David Kastrup, 2013/09/30