Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

[ul]

Zitat von Graham Percival <address@hidden>:

> On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:45:15PM +0000, James wrote:
> > If you are comfortable with making patches and compiling, LilyDev is
> > probably not for you. If you are not or want a ready-to-go
> > environment and don't care that it's on some 'old' Linux release
> > (i.e. not new and shiny) then LilyDev is perfectly fine.
>
> Agreed.  Urs: if you didn't get that impression from reading the
> CG, then could you suggest somewhere to add something to that
> effect (or maybe just copy James' comment literally) ?  We don't
> actually want to discourage experienced linux users from using
> their native environment; like you, I would find it a bit
> insulting if a project really did claim that I wasn't able to set
> up my own devel environment.  That said, we want to make it
> absolutely clear that sorting out the potentially-complicated
> build dependencies is not *required* from contributors.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham

I'll give it a shot ASAP. Probably it's only an issue of two or three  
tiny rewordings, just to give the right *impression*.
I think I'm quite clear about how it should be.

Unfortunately I'm suffering from Holiday's Disease. That is, as long  
as the children and particularly my wife are at home I don't have  
access to a Linux box or in general to a computer with more than 10  
minutes of coherent concentration ;-)
Any activity that relies on either of these conditions has to wait  
until next week. And I have to admit that LilyPond  
documentation/website isn't absolutely on the top of the list.

Best
Urs