[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0?
From: |
karl |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:50:52 +0100 (CET) |
Carl Peterson:
...
> Retyping by far. I pretty much write exclusively a cappella SATB, and I
> have developed a very specific template/workflow for the part combining and
> layout. I've tried a few different ways of getting the music from these
> formats into LP, and in each case, I found myself spending longer in
> cleaning up the resulting LilyPond code than if I had just transcribed it
> manually from the other program.
...
What if the midi->lilypond conversion could be made better?
I'm currently looking into that.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
- Re: 3.0?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, karl, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, karl, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Janek Warchoł, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Janek Warchoł, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?,
karl <=
- Re: 3.0?, Paul Morris, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Sorensen, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Paul Morris, 2014/01/11
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Janek Warchoł, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/12
- Re: 3.0?, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09