Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond

[Urs Liska]

Am 13.01.2014 11:14, schrieb Phil Holmes:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>; "Joram Berger"
> <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:58 AM
> Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
>
>
> > "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> > > not to update the page with the good example.
> >
> > Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
> > the set there?  I think that it would make an excellent addition.
> >
> > As an _only_ example for LilyPond's capabilities, it seems a bit
> > outlandish.  I agree that it's disappointing after you put this amount
> > of work into it and that this should have been considered earlier in the
> > discussion.
>
> I'm not overworried about that - I did it as an exercise.

_Of course_ I was only talking about _adding_ the Bach example and the link.

I will see if I find the time for updating the page, as I obviously 
speak German well enough ;-)

> > --
> > David Kastrup
>
> Anyway:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3803
>
> --
> Phil Holmes