Re: Question about the make check tests

[David Kastrup]

James <address@hidden> writes:

> On 22/01/14 18:16, David Kastrup wrote:
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Think it's worth putting this up as an Issue, so as not to lose it.
>> Probably worth putting up as _9_ issues since tackling one in general
>> will be independent from tackling another.
>>
> I haven't forgotten about this.
>
> I'll try and do it sometime today.

I was going to say that most of them will spend not much more than 5-10
minutes to fix anyway, but on second thought I am not sure about that:
"programming error" indicates a message that should not be appearing in
the first place, so it's not just a question of routing the regtest
around the error: even if the regtest in itself is doing something bad,
a "programming error" will not likely be an appropriate response.

-- 
David Kastrup