[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by ad
From: |
Joram |
Subject: |
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2015 19:01:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
Hi,
me too, I would not call it absolute then, because the octaves inside
this command are note absolute anymore. Am I right that the proposal is
an easier way of writing \transpose c <octave> { } ?
Why not just advertise \transpose c c' in the docs? I would consider it
clear and short enough.
And I would not change the names of \relative but rather invent a new
one (like \octavate – just as a (non-convincing) example from the top of
my head), if at all.
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2015/05/03
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/05/03
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/05/03
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/05/03
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2015/05/04
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/05/04
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Francisco Vila, 2015/05/06
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/05/06
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), tdanielsmusic, 2015/05/06