[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by ad
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Wed, 6 May 2015 21:32:53 -0400 |
On May 6, 2015, at 14:43 , David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Neither \octave { bes, c d e f } nor \octave c { c' bes as g } or
> \octave c'' { c' bes as g } seem particularly convincing.
+1
> \absolute c { c; bes as g } \absolute c'’ { c' bes as g }
After further thought, and with respect, “meh." \transpose is effective,
mostly obvious, and doesn’t require explaining away things like a pitch
parameter with no effect that must be a c.
Is there anything stopping a user who wants a shorthand for \transpose c X
\absolute from defining one?
—
Dan
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), David Kastrup, 2015/05/05
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Keith OHara, 2015/05/06
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Carl Sorensen, 2015/05/06
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Joram, 2015/05/06
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Paul Morris, 2015/05/07
- Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), Francisco Vila, 2015/05/06
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), k-ohara5a5a, 2015/05/06
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), tdanielsmusic, 2015/05/06
Re: absolute pitch entry: accept an offset octave (issue 235010043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/05/07