Re: Doc: NR: 3.x Clarification for \keepWithTag and fix Typo in example (issue 279140043 by address@hidden)

[dak]

https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2323
Documentation/notation/input.itely:2323: \keepWithTag #'(A B)
On 2016/02/21 12:17:12, simon.albrecht wrote:
> I do think we should advertise the proper LilyPond syntax of
> \keepWithTag A.B
> here. It’s quite easier to type and nicer. I’d also prefer
> \tag A {}
> over
> \tag #'A {}
> but I don’t know if this is enough of a ‘standard’ – David?

Tags tended to be chosen in ways not matching a LilyPond "word", for
example containing numbers.  Since they are not used as \word but only
ever as symbols, there was no incentive to choose them compatibly before
x.y acquired a Scheme-level meaning.

https://codereview.appspot.com/279140043/