[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2016 23:54:05 +0100 (CET) |
>> (1) minimum-space
>> (2) show-length
>> (3) hide-below-length
>> (4) hide-if-shorter-than
>> (5) minimum-visibility
>> (6) visibility-threshold
>> (7) printing-threshold
>> (8) extender-threshold
>
> At a first glance, the property is still the same, just the
> behaviour for shorter extenders changed:
>
> before: shorter extenders are prolonged
> after: shorter extenders are not visible
>
> But at a second glance, the minimum-length for LilyPond grobs
> usually means that the object is visible and the length is at least
> minimum-length (for glissandi, etc.). Using it to hide a shorter
> object feels inconsistent, IMHO. So I agree with Werner. But I
> have no favourite naming, all of them sound wrong to me - a slight
> preference for (6).
What about `length-threshold'?
Werner
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Paul, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Abraham Lee, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, tisimst, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/22
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Dan Eble, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Noeck, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Trevor Daniels, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Noeck, 2016/12/17
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Urs Liska, 2016/12/14
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, David Nalesnik, 2016/12/14