[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/* |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:09:04 +0100 (CET) |
> Nevertheless: two parameters would obfuscate the fact that the
> internal logic would always decide to use only one of those lengths
> and to ignore the other.
You could add something like
This parameter is mutually exclusive with @code{forced-length}.
to make this more visible.
> For the case of two parameters I like best:
>
> (forced-length ,ly:dimension? "A forced lyric extender
> is given this length if possible.")
> (collapse-length ,ly:dimension? "An automatically generated
> lyric extender is suppressed if it would be shorter than
> this length.")
LGTM, thanks.
Werner
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, (continued)
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Simon Albrecht, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/15
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Paul, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Knut Petersen, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Paul, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Abraham Lee, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, tisimst, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/22
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Dan Eble, 2016/12/20
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/21
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Alexander Kobel, 2016/12/18
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Noeck, 2016/12/16
- Re: music function to be included somewhere in scm/*, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/12/16